The Czech Republic’s Second Amendment Proposal Is a Step in the right Direction

On Thursday, the Czech Republic’s lower house of parliament approved a constitutional amendment that would enshrine the right to bear arms. One hundred and thirty-nine out of 200 MPs approved the change after it was suggested by interior minister Milan Chovanec who asked the houses of parliament to “show [him] a single terrorist attack in Europe perpetrated using a legally owned weapon.” The move is a reply to the violent and numerous terror attacks that have been sweeping Europe since 2015.

According to the proposal: “This constitutional bill is in reaction to the recent increase of security threats, especially the danger of violent acts such as isolated terrorist attacks…active attackers or other violent hybrid threats.”

The pretense of the Czech Republic’s measure cannot entirely be compared with that of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. While the American founding fathers included the right to bear arms in order to protect citizens from their own government, the Czechs want their population to carry firearms in order to “help with the security of the country.”

However, despite being born out of pragmatism, this move is still fundamentally important. Czechs are fond of the right to bear arms, especially in comparison to their neighbors. In a population of about 10 million, over 800,000 firearms are registered to date. This number has been increasing drastically since the fall of the Soviet Union. The Czech Republic allows concealed carry and does not even specifically ban guns in bars and clubs (though many owners have their own policies on that). “Gun-free zones” on schools and campuses do not exist: the law does not prohibit concealed carry there either.

Constitutionally enshrining the right to bear arms would also serve as a tool of defense against the European Union. The EU Commission in Brussels agreed on stricter gun rules last December, with EU interior ministers sealing the legislative package despite several members, including the Czechs, voting against it. The new directive institutes a complete ban on semi-automatic firearms, tightens regulations on online purchases, and allows for an exchange of information about gun owners across the continent. The Czech government has already announced that it will challenge this directive through the European Union Court of Justice.

The EU apparently failed to notice that member states like the United Kingdom, France, and Germany already have similar gun control measures yet have been hit by terrorist attacks carried out with illegally acquired firearms. Before leaving office, former French president François Hollande criticized Donald Trump (after the latter claimed that “Paris isn’t Paris anymore”) by saying: “Here we don’t have people taking up arms to shoot into crowds.” It takes guts to be this delusional.

More interestingly, countries like France have recognized that citizens with guns can actually be effective. A few months ago, the République allowed off-duty police officers to carry their weapons in private. A ban on firearms would end up only affecting the part of the population that actually should be armed: law-abiding citizens with good intentions.

With the gun amendment approved by the lower Czech house, the upper house is expected to confirm the measure soon. And with Czech president Miloš Zeman a known supporter of gun rights, the Czechs are on their way of becoming the first European country with a quasi-Second Amendment.

Interior minister Chovanec recently pointed out that armed citizens would be able to shoot terrorists who attempt to ram large vehicles into crowds of innocent people, as has already happened in France, the UK, and Germany. As of now, such an attack has not happened in the Czech Republic; given recent developments, it would seem ill-advised for a terrorist to try.

This article was first published by Rare.

Thanks for liking and sharing!

About Bill Wirtz

My name is Bill, I'm from Luxembourg and I write about the virtues of a free society. I favour individual and economic freedom and I believe in the capabilities people can develop when they have to take their own responsibilities.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s