EU-nationalism is a monster of our own creation

Whenever there is a crisis, there are a num- ber of ways to deal with it. It stands to reason, in most situations, that an organisation re-evaluates the way it has been conducting itself, which may or may not have lead to the crisis in the first place. Brexit is such an opportunity for the European Union.

The EU is left with a political class which not only didn’t believe that an exit from their organisation would ever happen, but which is also incapable of drawing the conclusion that their mantra has been seriously questioned. Even the day after the Brexit vote, the conclusion in Brussels was that this would be the opportunity to continue to drive European integration even further.

However, public debate around Brexit has revealed more than just a blind political class which doesn’t admit to a more than decade-long faux-pas: it is the portrayal of euroscepticism as a backwards and dangerously nationalistic ideology that is so indicative of the way that the EU wants to go. It has indeed changed course, because one thing is for certain: political integration as an antidote to war in Europe is a completely hopeless argument.

No EU leader will be able to convince an electorate that leaving the union will lead to a new armed conflict on the continent. David Cameron of all people should know, since he famously made that attempt, by stating that leaving the EU could lead to World War 3. We will all supposedly cower in our bunkers on March 29 2019.

In order to gain popular support for its political endeavours, Brussels has chosen a more ideological way: creating a European identity. is takes the form of #IamEuropean hashtags on Twitter, or protest chants – the likes of “EU we love you” – along with historical symbolisms such as the French president Emmanuel Macron choosing Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony for his victory speech at the Louvre last year. But these are just political gadgets in comparison to the broad range of EU-funded initiatives for young people. e keyword is Erasmus+.

The Erasmus programme funds more than just study- ing exchanges. Since it merged with the EU’s “Youth in Action” initiative, it also funds student conferences, which, to no surprise, do not embolden young people to be very critical of the EU. e “European Youth Parliament (EYP)”, co-funded through Eramus+, recruits students as young as 16 for its events, in which they simulate EU debates.

The structure of the debates makes it imperative for the students to find solutions to current problems that need to be solved by the EU. Absence of action is not an option, and in fact, minors are peer-pressured in committee sessions to decide by unanimous consent: “After all, it’d be such a bore if your group were the only one without a final text.”

Another project, “Young European Leadership (YEL)”, (also co-funded with EU tax- payer money), states that it wants to empower young people to be active European citizens, who provide critical input. Critical only to an extent, it seems, as YEL has been awarded the Euro- pean Charlemagne Youth Prize 2016, as one of the best projects “in the entire European Union to foster European integration”.

These are just two of a long list of examples of EU-funded programmes, in which “empowering Euro- pean citizens” is code for being nothing but European Union support groups. These young people are own out to numerous countries and accommodated on EU expenses, taking sel es with Martin Schulz and standing straight to the EU’s anthem. Secondary school and university students are told that they too can have flourishing careers in EU bureaucracies, and return from their trips with a twisted notion of what it means to be European.

To an extent, they cannot be blamed. If all you had been told repeatedly is that the EU represents all that is good on this continent, and when it has been implied that its existence is essential to civilised cooperation, then you too would regard its opponents as bigots. If you’re really interested in why prominent eurosceptics face so much abuse online, look no further than EU-funded “education” initiatives.

The future of EU leadership will not be the Jean-Claude Junckers or Michel Barniers, but much more in the image of former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt: a man so fanatical that he wants to create a “United States of Europe”. For him and his supporters, the unitary European state can be created once people internalise this “European identity”.

EU-funded projects, and political organisations which fuel the concept of EU nationalism, don’t feel set back by Brexit, but much rather emboldened by the political capital they seek to get out of its repercussions.

What we need are young people who are willing to doubt interventionist governments and who aren’t afraid to ask the fundamental questions about the nature and role of the state. What we are likely getting, however, is a generation which has been set to support this political project no matter what, either because they reap personal benefits from it, or because they swallow the political ideology of the “European identity”. is has large implications as to how we will debate the European Union in years to come, including many for a United Kingdom outside the EU.

We can combat this ten- dency with the same tools we use to argue against interven- tionist nationalists already. It means making a consistent case for free trade and against

protectionist food standards or agricultural subsidies. It means arguing for accountability of the political system, instead of a bureaucracy sheltered thou- sands of miles away from the citizens it purports to govern.

It means warning of the inherent danger of centralisation by emboldening individuals to bring power back to local communities and regions. As much as there is a good case against EU nationalism and EU integration, there is an even better case for individualism. If this generation of young people is indeed one of idealists, then we need to suggest to them ideals worth standing for.

They are called individualism, limited government, and liberty.

This article was published in the sixth edition of the magazine The Conservative. You can get your free copy online.

Pictures are Creative Commons.

Thanks for liking and sharing!

About Bill Wirtz

My name is Bill, I'm from Luxembourg and I write about the virtues of a free society. I favour individual and economic freedom and I believe in the capabilities people can develop when they have to take their own responsibilities.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s